Return to “The Rights” table of contents
Why Money in Politics is Dangerous and How It Undermines Democracy
In a democracy, the government is supposed to represent the people—but what happens when money takes over? In the United States, big money in politics has become one of the biggest threats to fair elections and honest government. Wealthy donors, corporations, and special interest groups spend billions of dollars influencing elections. This means politicians often listen more to their biggest donors than to regular voters like you and me.
How Much Money Was Spent in the Last Election?
The amount of money flowing into elections is shocking. In the 2020 U.S. elections, more than $14 billion was spent on campaigns—more than double what was spent in 2016. In the 2024 election, Elon Musk gave approximately $200 million to help election Donald Trump. When Trump was election, Elon Musk’s net worth jumped from about $200 billon to about $400 billion in the span of a month. Billionaires and corporations funneled millions into super PACs (Political Action Committees) to help their favorite candidates win. Instead of elections being fair contests of ideas, they have turned into battles of who can raise the most money.
Why Is This a Problem?
Money in politics is dangerous because it undermines democracy in several ways:
- Politicians Work for Donors, Not the People – When candidates rely on massive donations from corporations and the wealthy, they feel pressure to serve those donors’ interests, not the voters’. This means laws often benefit the rich instead of the public.
- Elections Become Unfair – A candidate with millions in campaign funds can run endless TV ads, hire the best campaign staff, and crush opponents who don’t have as much money. This means the best leader doesn’t always win—just the richest.
- Ordinary People Can’t Run for Office – Running for office is extremely expensive. Without wealthy donors or personal fortune, many smart, honest people never get a chance to run because they can’t afford it. This means regular citizens have little say in government.
- It Leads to Oligarchy – An oligarchy is a system where a small group of rich and powerful people control the government. When money dominates politics, the U.S. starts looking less like a democracy and more like an oligarchy—where the wealthy elite hold all the power.
What Can We Do?
The best solution is a constitutional amendment that guarantees campaign finance reform. This would:
- Limit how much money individuals and corporations can donate
- End dark money in politics by making all donations transparent
- Create publicly funded elections so every candidate has a fair shot
- Provide a small and fixed amount of money to every citizen that they can only use to donate to campaigns to dilute the power of very wealthy few.
If we don’t fix this problem, our government will continue to be controlled by the wealthiest few instead of the people. A government that listens only to money isn’t a democracy at all—it’s a system rigged against ordinary Americans. If we want real justice, we must demand a system where every voice, not just the richest ones, truly matters.
The Amendment
SECTION 1
Purpose
To restore democratic integrity, prevent corruption, and ensure equal political influence among all citizens, this amendment establishes public campaign financing, restricts private money in elections, and guarantees transparency in political contributions.
SECTION 2
Public Campaign Financing
(a) Congress shall establish a publicly funded election system to provide each eligible citizen with a Democracy Credit—a fixed amount of public funds to donate to candidates of their choice in federal elections.
(b) All candidates who accept public funding shall agree to reject private donations beyond the Democracy Credits and abide by spending limits set by law.
(c) States shall be encouraged to adopt similar systems for state and local elections.
SECTION 3
Limitations on Private and Corporate Contributions
(a) No private individual may contribute more than a reasonable limit, to be set by Congress, to any federal candidate, political party, or campaign-related entity.
(b) Corporations, labor unions, and other organizations are prohibited from making direct or indirect contributions to campaigns or from funding political advertisements.
(c) The use of Super PACs, dark money groups, and independent expenditures to influence elections is hereby prohibited.
SECTION 4
Transparency and Accountability
(a) All campaign contributions and expenditures, including those by individuals, shall be publicly disclosed in real time.
(b) Any attempt to bypass disclosure requirements through shell companies, non-profits, or other entities shall be punishable by law.
(c) Congress shall establish an independent commission to enforce this amendment and penalize violations.
SECTION 5
Enforcement and Supremacy
(a) Congress and the states shall have the power to enforce this amendment through appropriate legislation.
(b) This amendment shall supersede any prior laws or judicial precedents, including Citizens United v. FEC and related rulings, that allow unlimited political spending.
SECTION 6
Implementation
This amendment shall take effect two years after ratification to allow for the establishment of public campaign finance systems.
Common Questions
What does “money in politics” mean?
Amending Article V is crucial because it currently makes changing the Constitution nearly impossible, limiting essential reforms. With Article V’s high barriers, it’s challenging to pass vital amendments, even for laws the majority supports. Major issues like term limits, abolishing the Electoral College, or reforming the Senate and Supreme Court are unlikely to happen if Article V remains unchanged. Making Article V easier to amend would empower citizens to address pressing issues and modernize the Constitution to reflect today’s values and needs.
It refers to the massive amounts of money spent by corporations, wealthy individuals, and special interest groups to influence elections and policy decisions.
The Founding Fathers made the Constitution hard to amend to unite the 13 colonies, overcoming deep divisions after the failures of the Articles of Confederation, which had left the nation too weak and decentralized. This innovative Constitution created a stronger federal government while protecting states’ rights, but its rigidity soon became a double-edged sword.
Its unyielding amendment process has made change nearly impossible, leading to severe consequences. The Civil War, for instance, might have been avoided if Americans could have amended the Constitution to end slavery peacefully. Instead, pressure built up, like steam in a volcano, until it erupted in a devastating conflict. Post-Civil War, Jim Crow laws and struggles for civil rights persisted for a century because it was so difficult to make changes for equal rights. This rigidity continues to foster polarization today, trapping the U.S. in outdated systems that don’t reflect modern values.
In flexible democracies, constitutions release pressure gradually by evolving with the people’s needs. The American Constitution, however, risks explosive discord, just as it did before the Civil War, by making even crucial amendments so hard to achieve.
How does big money influence elections?
Wealthy donors and corporations fund candidates, super PACs, and political ads, giving them more influence over who gets elected and what policies they support.
What is dark money?
Dark money refers to political spending by groups that do not have to disclose their donors, making it difficult to track who is influencing elections.
How much money was spent in recent elections?
The 2020 election saw over $14 billion in campaign spending, more than doubling the amount from 2016.
Why is big money in politics a problem?
It allows the wealthiest few to have more political influence than average citizens, leading to policies that benefit special interests instead of the public.
What is an oligarchy, and how does it relate to this issue?
An oligarchy is a system where a small group of wealthy elites control the government. When money controls politics, the U.S. moves closer to an oligarchy instead of a democracy.
Is there a connection between campaign donations and government decisions?
Yes. Studies show that politicians are more likely to pass laws that benefit their donors, even when those policies go against the wishes of the majority.
Can an average citizen’s vote really compete with billionaires’ donations?
Not under the current system. When wealthy donors and super PACs fund political campaigns, they drown out the voices of ordinary voters.
Possible Solutions
Can campaign finance reform fix this issue?
Yes, but current laws have too many loopholes. A constitutional amendment would be the strongest way to ensure lasting reform.
What would a constitutional amendment on money in politics do?
It would limit private campaign donations, ban corporate and dark money influence, and create a system where every citizen has equal political power.
Would the amendment ban all political donations?
No. It would limit large donations and replace them with a publicly funded system where every citizen receives small Democracy Credits to donate to candidates.
How would public campaign financing work?
Every voter would receive a set amount of public funds to donate to candidates of their choice, making elections fairer and reducing the influence of billionaires.
Would corporations still be able to influence elections?
No. The amendment would prohibit corporate donations and independent expenditures that influence elections.
What about free speech? Would limiting money in politics violate the First Amendment?
No. Money is not speech—it is power. The amendment would restore fair elections while still allowing people to express their opinions.
Would the amendment overturn Citizens United?
Yes. It would override the Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. FEC, which allowed unlimited corporate spending in elections.
Has any country successfully removed money from politics?
Yes. Countries like Canada, Germany, and Sweden have strong campaign finance laws that prevent big money from corrupting their elections.
Would Congress ever pass such an amendment?
It would be difficult, but public pressure can force politicians to act. Many reform movements are already pushing for change.
How can an amendment be passed?
Under the current version of Article V, it would require a two-thirds vote in Congress and ratification by 38 states, or a constitutional convention called by two-thirds of the states. For that reason, it’s imperative that we first amend Article V to make future amendments, like this one, easier to pass.
What can citizens do to help pass this amendment?
First and foremost, amend Article V. Once Article V is amended, people can support organizations fighting for reform, vote for candidates who reject big money, and demand action from their representatives.
What happens if we don’t pass an amendment?
If big money remains in politics, elections will continue to be dominated by wealthy donors, and democracy will weaken as public trust erodes.
Leave a Reply